14 Comments
User's avatar
Uncomfortably Numb's avatar

Terrific essay, well written, and spot on !!

MYSTIC BAZAAR's avatar

Thank you for reading x

Kirsten's avatar

Great article. I really like how you explain how words have meanings that when used, steer a person towards certain conclusions. Your last little video gave me the chills. Where did the towers go? Look at the dust on this car - that's the tower.

MYSTIC BAZAAR's avatar

Thanks for your comments!! I'm glad you liked the article. Now you know that words can frame your beliefs you will notice it happening a lot more all around us, it's quite scary. I can't unsee it now I know.

Kirsten's avatar

Yes! I've actually known it for a long time now, I just liked the simple and effective way you explained it in regards to Dr Woods book. 👍🏽💕

MYSTIC BAZAAR's avatar

Oh right x thanks x

RJ Sykes's avatar

What matters is people being capable of independent thought and discernment without being influenced by emotions. When one can truly think for themselves, can discern fact from fiction, can understand and interpret the receipts, nothing can sway that person. Emotions are the problem.

MYSTIC BAZAAR's avatar

Emotions will be involved as that's one of the reasons for the attacks, to stir emotional responses which makes it easier to control. I think with Dr Wood's evidence you don't need to think about it, it's things everyone can see with their own eyes, but unless they look at it all as a whole and with fresh eyes & a new perspective, it's easy to see and you can't believe how you never noticed before!! Its because we were repeatedly programmed for years before the event, and as soon as it happened we were told what happened and it was repeated and repeated over and over so that's what you believe you saw!! Its getting people to realise how obvious it is and how much evidence was ignored, and how much more evidence has been hidden? X well that's what I've seen over the last few months.

RJ Sykes's avatar

It's very obvious, and I like the way she explains things; it makes sense to describe the visualisations in a way that we can compare them in our minds like this. Yes, repeated narratives are embedded so they become accepted as 'truth' over time,. regardless of how illogical they may be.

Kirsten's avatar

I don't entirely agree. Emotions naturally are not a part of thinking through math problems for example. But emotions are a natural part of the process of thinking through an event like 9/11, and many other societal events/ societal problems. We are whole human beings, and our minds, logic, and reasoning are not separated from our heart and feelings. Emotions can't just be erased when we are looking at such destruction and people falling out of buildings on 9/11. The development is becoming aware of emotions that arise, and aware of the ways our emotions steer our thinking, reasoning and our biases.

MYSTIC BAZAAR's avatar

If you are new to the work of Dr wood, this article i did, does a quick intro to her evidence all at once. There's a very short video, or photo evidence for each piece of evidence, you can see with your own eyes!! If you look at it with fresh eyes, you will be amazed at how obvious it all is, i was when I first saw it. Let me know what you think, I'd be really interested to hear your opinion after looking at it. https://mysticbazaar.substack.com/p/see-all-of-dr-woods-911-evidence?r=6f4qhy

RJ Sykes's avatar

Yes, the media naturally plays on emotions for this reason.

9/11 Revisionist's avatar

A great article as always, Mystic...

Let me add this, as I myself have tried to break through to some in the 9/11 "truth" movement to try and see if they can apply intellectual humility, with regards to Dr Wood's evidence presented.

Psychology of resistance to truth about 9/11

A discussion with Fran Shur & Marti Hopper, psychologists

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/psychology-of-resistance-to-truth

A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.

Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.

Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.

Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..

Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/

Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings

43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings

Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY

Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance. - Albert Einstein.

A time comes when silence is betrayal. - Martin Luther King

Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/

Vancine Brown's avatar

I have heard that “educators” are going to continue to teach the hijacked plane theory in our schools and universities ? Is this true?